Which statement regarding spinal flexion and extension outcomes is false?

The statement regarding attaining full spinal flexion for a patient with osteoporosis and full spinal extension with a patient with spinal stenosis being neither desirable nor helpful is incorrect. It highlights the importance of understanding the implications of spinal movements in different conditions.

For patients with osteoporosis, full spinal flexion is indeed problematic; this condition increases the risk of vertebral fractures. Spinal flexion can exacerbate these risks by placing increased compressive loads on the vertebrae, particularly in individuals with weakened bone density.

On the other hand, for patients with spinal stenosis, full spinal extension can often lead to increased symptoms. Spinal stenosis results in a narrowing of the spinal canal, and extension can exacerbate symptoms by placing additional pressure on already compromised neural structures.

Recognizing that both spinal flexion and extension outcomes can vary in their benefits depending on the specific condition of the patient is crucial in geriatric physical therapy. Tailoring interventions to the individual needs and conditions of the patient is essential for promoting safety and improving functional outcomes.