In forward head posture (FHP), which of the following statements is false?

The statement that using a Tragus marker line from C7, a larger angle represents a more pronounced forward head posture (FHP) is indeed false. In the context of measuring FHP, a larger angle typically indicates a lesser degree of forward head posture. The Tragus marker line method assesses the alignment of the head in relation to the cervical spine. A more pronounced forward head position results in a smaller angle between the Tragus and the vertical line from the C7 vertebra. Therefore, the assertion that a larger angle reflects a more pronounced FHP contradicts the established understanding of this assessment technique.

In contrast, other statements about forward head posture are true. The suboccipitals, which are key cervical extensors, do shorten in response to FHP as they become overactive in maintaining head position. The prevertebral muscles, which act as cervical flexors, lengthen due to the forward shift of the head. Additionally, research supports a linear relationship between age and FHP, particularly noted in older women, making that aspect accurate as well. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for recognizing the implications of FHP in geriatric populations and guiding appropriate interventions in physical therapy.